Content deleted Content added
→Insistence: reply |
→Commentary and bias again: new section |
||
Line 166:
: And naturally, it does not mean Milne's admirers and "friends" are not immune, to reverse the intended meaning of [https://twitter.com/NeilClark66/status/707242158844203008 tweets] from a contributor to the Putinite [[RT (TV network)|RT]] network and website, from "Biased, agenda-driven" writing. [[User:Philip Cross|Philip Cross]] ([[User talk:Philip Cross|talk]]) 12:15, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
== Commentary and bias again ==
Further to the above, I see Philip Cross has been back on this page again this month, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Seumas_Milne&type=revision&diff=841085804&oldid=839874983 reinserting] lots of polemical negative media commentary, and then immediately [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Seumas_Milne&type=revision&diff=841086816&oldid=841086123 removing] positive commentary. You can't really be more blatant than this. As discussed previously, this is a pathetic and totally uninformative way to go about creating a BLP, twice over: an encyclopedia entry about a person is not meant to be a "review" of the subject based on an aggregation of general media commentary on them (whether positive or negative) and certainly not one selectively sourced solely to reflect negative viewpoints. If PC can't edit a page with any sense of either a) how to write a factual bio that actually offers information about the subject rather than about other people's random views of them or b) how to write disinterestedly and neutrally, they shouldn't be editing that page. As people are beginning to notice, this is a problem with his behaviour across WP. <small>'''[[User:N-HH|<span style="color: navy;">N-HH</span>]] [[User talk:N-HH|<span style="color: blue;">talk</span>]]/[[Special:Contributions/N-HH|<span style="color: blue;">edits</span>]]'''</small> 21:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
| |||