MuZemike

Or: The War Room

Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!

Deleted pages – if I deleted a page you were involved with in which you have an issue with, talk to me about it first here. I will be happy to userfy for you, restore the page if I believed to have made an error in judgment, or fulfill any other request within reason. If you would like a copy of any other deleted page to work on, also let me know. Keep in mind that I will not, for any reason, restore copyright violations or attack pages. See Wikipedia:Why was my page deleted?

Welcome to my talk page! Please do not bring discussions here from other pages. Please use diffs when talking about edits. If you leave me a message on my talk page, I will reply on my talk page, so you may want to watch this page. I will not continue to watch a talk page if the discussion has migrated. I check my watchlist regularly. I don't always add talk pages to my watchlist if I comment on them, unless it's a user talk page or I started an important discussion. Thank you. Oh, and remember to post new comments and topics at the bottom of the page or the section in which you are discussing and sign every post you make here by simply adding four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your message.

Hello I dont know the right way to contact you but fyi I am 16 years old & have mental problems. Please take it easy on me if I make a mistake. SlashinatorX (talk) 21:51, 2 October 2009 (UTC) MLP/LP(M) Thank you for the history merge on Malta Labour Party --Rumping (talk) 20:34, 2 October 2009 (UTC) No problem! MuZemike 21:00, 2 October 2009 (UTC) Unblock request of 202.70.61.139 Hello MuZemike. 202.70.61.139 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), whom you have blocked, is requesting to be unblocked. The request for unblock is on hold while waiting for a comment from you. Regards, DMacks (talk) 05:22, 3 October 2009 (UTC) I don't think I blocked the IP directly, as there is nothing in the block log. Is it autoblocked, by chance? MuZemike 20:09, 3 October 2009 (UTC) OK. I see. I blocked 202.70.61.128/27 for 2 weeks for blatant misinformation/vandalism per Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive566#Misinformation vandal has returned.. Also see this block log. This rangeblock has been effective for one week, already. You think it would be a good idea to remove the rangeblock early to allow this IP to edit? MuZemike 20:19, 3 October 2009 (UTC) (back from a day mostly off-line, w00t!) I don't object to giving that IP a hole in the range-block. OTOH, if there is IP hopping, not sure that would necessarily give this user a permanent hole or prevent vandals from getting this IP. Cleaner for this user to have a login and therefore avoid the anon-block that is successfully preventing vandalism. DMacks (talk) 16:30, 4 October 2009 (UTC) Portal:Gang I just created a Portal (Portal:Gang) I need your help. If you have time, Can you help add some content to my portal. I would appreciate it, Thanks.--Zink Dawg -- 06:49, 3 October 2009 (UTC) Hey .. I followed up on what you said on JohnHistory and Calton pages because I was asked to on my talk page. You have my support. — Ched :  ?  04:57, 4 October 2009 (UTC) More development info about the SNES Super Punch-Out!! Here is the source. Should the article also include some of this info as well? Parrothead1983 (talk) 07:53, 4 October 2009 (UTC) Mathemagician57721 Mathemagician57721 has another named sock CombinationPermutation (talk · contribs) which is currently being a royal pain in the butt. I filed an AIV, but no one seems to be active right now, and he's filing false 3RR reports and continuing to attack me, similar to what he did with Farix, and is even editing my AIV report. If you're around, can you take a look? -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 21:50, 4 October 2009 (UTC) Yep, I know. I already passed to Checkusers on that. I'll look more into that in the morning. MuZemike 04:51, 5 October 2009 (UTC) Smoovedogg (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Can you clarify where this user made a legal threat? I can't seem to find it in his recent edits. I don't doubt your action, but I've cited his block in response to a comment he made, and judging from recent events, I can guarantee some impropriety will be alleged, mine or otherwise. --King Öomie 06:31, 5 October 2009 (UTC) On his talk page, he offered to go forward with legal action here. MuZemike 14:37, 5 October 2009 (UTC) Hmm, not sure how I missed that. Seems he's asking for an unblock of the basis of understanding NLT, without actually withdrawing the offer. --King Öomie 14:46, 5 October 2009 (UTC) Right, as the reviewing admins have already said, he must retract his legal threat in order to resume editing. MuZemike 14:49, 5 October 2009 (UTC) Yeah... seems like odd behavior. Obviously he read the policy page, so I'm not sure how he thought he had a case for unblocking without that particular puzzle piece. --King Öomie 15:07, 5 October 2009 (UTC) User:71.68.211.187 Hi I recently reported this user as I suspected User:ChristianGirl2) was a sockpuppet of it. User:71.68.211.187 has been blocked and they have User:ChristianGirl2) set up as a second account which I thought was against Wikipedia's rules if you're blocked? Am just not understanding from the notes why this was declined. I want to make it clear I'm not questioning your decision, it's just I've never reported a sock puppet before so I want to understand your decision so I don't make the same error again --5 albert square (talk) 23:57, 5 October 2009 (UTC) All I did so far was decline the CheckUser request. CheckUser is not necessary here, because the IP is clearly that user. Another admin should come around and make a determination if needed. Being one, I could act on it, I'm sitting on it right now because ChristianGirl12 has not made a single edit, yet. If the block expires, and the registered account still hasn't made an edit, then there would have been no purpose behind such a block. MuZemike 00:12, 6 October 2009 (UTC) Ah ok, no worries, sorry like I say first time I've reported a sock puppet and I thought that was the whole request being denied --5 albert square (talk) 00:43, 6 October 2009 (UTC) Hi I thought I would let you know that User:ChristianGirl2 has been active on their account. They blanked the page to remove the sock puppet tag despite still being banned under User:71.68.211.187. I will revert it but thought I would make you aware of this --5 albert square (talk) 14:15, 6 October 2009 (UTC) Thank you for letting me know. ChristianGirl has now been blocked 3 days; the IP's block reset for block evasion. MuZemike 14:29, 6 October 2009 (UTC) No worries, I will keep an eye on both accounts now that I know for sure that they're sock puppets of each other and will report them again if still having trouble :) --5 albert square (talk) 14:49, 6 October 2009 (UTC) Keep all? The result of the Gillabhrenainn Ua hAnradhain mass nomination was keep all? You figure? The majority, including the creator, seemed to realise that the articles should be listified. Also, if you had looked at the "keeps" in question, you would have realised that most of these were invalid, since they seemed to express the view that article length is sufficient reason to keep, even if the content is simply unsourced material unrelated to the subject. Strange decision. Lampman (talk) 02:58, 6 October 2009 (UTC) Then go ahead and listify. There is nothing stopping you, besides consensus saying otherwise, from doing so. I made that clear in my closing rationale. MuZemike 03:58, 6 October 2009 (UTC) DYK for U.S. Steel Yard On October 6, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article U.S. Steel Yard, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. BorgQueen (talk) 04:42, 6 October 2009 (UTC) Improving ConceptDraw PROJECT Could you, please, explain what type of references I need to add to make the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:CSOWind/ConceptDraw_PROJECT more notable? And what part of the article looks like spam? What else could be improved? Many thanks in advance. You can also contact me via andrey@csodessa.com CSOWind (talk) 07:32, 7 October 2009 (UTC) Template:Boxboxtop help On my Userpage, every time I click "Show" on the template, the other boxes disappear. Any way to fix this problem or direct me to a solution please--SGCommand (talk • contribs) 20:09, 6 October 2009 (UTC) Looks like all the userbox groups worked all right when I clicked on them. Anyways, I went through and cleaned up a little bit of code, including an extra {{boxboxbottom}} that was borking up the formatting of your sidebar (you may or may not have seen an |} right above your introduction – that was why). Cheers, MuZemike 23:57, 6 October 2009 (UTC) The WPVG Newsletter (Q3 2009) The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter Volume 2, No. 5 — 3rd Quarter, 2009 Previous issue | Next issue Project At a Glance As of Q3 2009, the project has: 126 Featured Articles 33 Featured Lists 16 Featured Topics 29 A-Class Articles 339 Good Articles 3 Good Topics Content Changes to Featured and Good content News items and announcements Feature: Video game FA maintenance Featured editor: Kung Fu Man Project Navigation VG Project Main pages Main project – talk Project category – talk Portal – talk VG Project Departments Assessment – talk Cleanup – talk Peer review – talk   Reference library – talk Newsletter – talk Video game images – talk To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list. Newsletter delivery by xenobot 04:18, 7 October 2009 (UTC)