Talk:$100,000 infield

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
edit

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 22:11, 20 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Source of name

edit

Was the infield actually paid that much, or was it just an expression (à la "million dollar taste")? --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 16:03, 2 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Certainly an expression. No way Connie Mack would pay that much. Basically an expression that they were worth that much. Rlendog (talk) 16:09, 2 May 2014 (UTC)Reply
I think the point was that the article fails to explain why they were called that, and when, and by whom. And it's a good point. The article has quite a large number of citations, but doesn't claim to put the words "hundred thousand dollar infield" into any contemporary mouths, nor cite that claim. I've added the "by whom?" tag to encourage somebody to fix that. TypoBoy (talk) 03:31, 16 November 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on $100,000 infield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:12, 12 October 2017 (UTC)Reply