Talk:1991 Andover tornado

Latest comment: 5 days ago by The Bushranger in topic Did you know nomination

Draft notability table

edit
EF5's Tornado AfD / AfC Table
Criteria no. Sub-criteria Description Pass? Fail? Comments
1 (Coverage) 1a Any coverage?  Y Quick-fail if criterion is not met
1b Any significant coverge? (e.g. CNN or the NYT)  Y
1c Any lasting coverage past 6 months after the tornado?  Y Usually a quick-pass
2 (Strength) 2a Was the tornado EF0-EF2? Usually a sign of non-notability, there are exceptions to this though
2b Was the tornado EF3? May be a sign of notability
2c Was the tornado EF4? Usually a sign of notability
2d Was the tornado EF5?  Y If a post-2013 EF5, then an instant pass. Usually a quick-pass
3 (Damage) 3a Did the tornado kill at least one person?  Y Usually a sign of notability
3b Did the tornado injure at least one person?  Y
3c Did the tornado cause monetary damage totaling over $200,000 USD?  Y
4 (Aftermath) 4a Did the tornado significantly damage a town?  Y If not, then usually a sign of non-notability
4b Any notable deaths?  Y Usually not the case, can be skipped
5 (Content) 5a Is the article not a CFORK of an existing section?  Y Quick-fail if criterion is not met
5b Can the content not be easily merged into a section?  Y Quick-fail if criterion is not met
5c Is the article longer than the page on its respective outbreak?  Y Usually a quick-pass
5d Is the article a GA, FA or has recently been featured on DYK?  Y Usually a quick-pass
6 (Overall) 6a Are at least five of these criterion met, with exceptions made if needed?  Y If at least 1b, 3b, 3c, 5c and 1c are met, then a pass is warranted. If not, then a fail is warranted. Exceptions can be made at my discretion.
Final verdict: Pass: Article should be made, I'll work on it today.

Did you know nomination

edit

 
The tornado at F4 intensity on the grounds of the McConnell Air Force Base
Created by EF5 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 12 past nominations.

EF5 17:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC).Reply

  • @EF5: Please provide a QPQ ASAP. Current QPQ rules require one to be provided at the time of the nomination, and noms can be closed without warning if one is not provided quickly. As it has been almost a week since the nom and no QPQ has been provided, the nomination will be closed if a QPQ is not provided soon. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 03:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Narutolovehinata5: Done. I don't remember this rule existing earlier this year, when was this set into motion? EF5 13:33, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
It's a new rule that was only introduced about a month or two ago following a WT:DYK discussion. Normally I would have just closed the nomination given the length of time that has passed, but given that you may not have been aware of the new rule I decided to ping instead and give a reminder. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:48, 26 November 2024 (UTC)Reply