Talk:1991 Andover tornado
Latest comment: 5 days ago by The Bushranger in topic Did you know nomination
1991 Andover tornado is currently an Earth sciences good article nominee. Nominated by EF5 at 01:53, 2 December 2024 (UTC) Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.) Short description: F5 tornado in 1991 |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Draft notability table
editCriteria no. | Sub-criteria | Description | Pass? | Fail? | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 (Coverage) | 1a | Any coverage? | Quick-fail if criterion is not met | ||
1b | Any significant coverge? (e.g. CNN or the NYT) | ||||
1c | Any lasting coverage past 6 months after the tornado? | Usually a quick-pass | |||
2 (Strength) | 2a | Was the tornado EF0-EF2? | Usually a sign of non-notability, there are exceptions to this though | ||
2b | Was the tornado EF3? | May be a sign of notability | |||
2c | Was the tornado EF4? | Usually a sign of notability | |||
2d | Was the tornado EF5? | If a post-2013 EF5, then an instant pass. Usually a quick-pass | |||
3 (Damage) | 3a | Did the tornado kill at least one person? | Usually a sign of notability | ||
3b | Did the tornado injure at least one person? | ||||
3c | Did the tornado cause monetary damage totaling over $200,000 USD? | ||||
4 (Aftermath) | 4a | Did the tornado significantly damage a town? | If not, then usually a sign of non-notability | ||
4b | Any notable deaths? | Usually not the case, can be skipped | |||
5 (Content) | 5a | Is the article not a CFORK of an existing section? | Quick-fail if criterion is not met | ||
5b | Can the content not be easily merged into a section? | Quick-fail if criterion is not met | |||
5c | Is the article longer than the page on its respective outbreak? | Usually a quick-pass | |||
5d | Is the article a GA, FA or has recently been featured on DYK? | Usually a quick-pass | |||
6 (Overall) | 6a | Are at least five of these criterion met, with exceptions made if needed? | If at least 1b, 3b, 3c, 5c and 1c are met, then a pass is warranted. If not, then a fail is warranted. Exceptions can be made at my discretion. | ||
Final verdict: | Pass: Article should be made, I'll work on it today. |
Did you know nomination
edit
( )
- ... that the 1991 Andover tornado (pictured) narrowly avoided hitting ten Rockwell B-1 Lancers, two of which were equipped with nuclear warheads? Source: https://www.ksn.com/weather/weather-stories/monday-marks-30-years-since-deadly-andover-tornado/#:~:text=It%20destroyed%20102%20base%20housing,had%20nuclear%20warheads%20on%20them.
- ALT1: ... that Andover, Kansas has been hit by numerous tornadoes, including an F5 tornado (pictured) in 1991, and an EF3 tornado in 2022? Source: https://www.cjonline.com/story/news/2022/05/02/andover-tornado-2022-ef-3-damage-path-injuries-wichita-kansas/9611988002/
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/HMT Night Hawk
- Comment: Fine, I promise this'll be the last tornado DYK. Funny enough, 2022 Andover tornado was approved today!
EF5 17:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC).
- @EF5: Please provide a QPQ ASAP. Current QPQ rules require one to be provided at the time of the nomination, and noms can be closed without warning if one is not provided quickly. As it has been almost a week since the nom and no QPQ has been provided, the nomination will be closed if a QPQ is not provided soon. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 03:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: Done. I don't remember this rule existing earlier this year, when was this set into motion? EF5 13:33, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- It's a new rule that was only introduced about a month or two ago following a WT:DYK discussion. Normally I would have just closed the nomination given the length of time that has passed, but given that you may not have been aware of the new rule I decided to ping instead and give a reminder. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 13:48, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5: Done. I don't remember this rule existing earlier this year, when was this set into motion? EF5 13:33, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
- Article new enough, QPQ complete, well-cited to reliable sources, Earwig checks indicate no apparent copyvio concerns. Suggesting the primary hook. - The Bushranger One ping only 05:02, 27 November 2024 (UTC)