This article was nominated for deletion on June 27 2006. The result of the discussion was Delete. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Copy
editThis article is almost a word for word copy of 128-bit article. Maybe merge them in some way? Or maybe delete it all the same.--Loxus (talk) 18:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
- Do you mean the first few sentences? They are fixed for all these n-bit articles by using a template to generate it for them all. The rest of the content is largely different. Widefox; talk 22:11, 5 July 2013 (UTC)