Talk:Afrobeats/GA1

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Versace1608 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: No Great Shaker (talk · contribs) 13:05, 17 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Basic GA criteria

edit
  1. Well written: the prose is clear and concise.  
  2. Well written: the spelling and grammar are correct.  
  3. Complies with the MOS guidelines for lead sections.  
  4. Complies with the MOS guidelines for article structure and layout.  
  5. Complies with the MOS guidelines for words to watch.  
  6. Complies with the MOS guidelines for writing about fiction – not applicable.
  7. Complies with the MOS guidelines for list incorporation – not applicable.
  8. Complies with the MOS guidelines for use of quotations.  
  9. All statements are verifiable with inline citations provided.  
  10. All inline citations are from reliable sources, etc.  
  11. Contains a list of all references in accordance with the layout style guideline.  
  12. No original research.  
  13. No copyright violations or plagiarism.  
  14. Broad in its coverage but within scope and in summary style.  
  15. Neutral.  
  16. Stable.  
  17. Illustrated, if possible – not applicable.
  18. Images are at least fair use and do not breach copyright – not applicable.

For reviews, I use the above list of criteria as a benchmark and complete the variables as I go along. Hope to provide some feedback soon. No Great Shaker (talk) 13:05, 17 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Happy to hear! This was my first 'major' article to write so happy to learn something from this if nothing else. Madbrad200 (talk) 19:32, 17 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hello, Brad. I've been very busy last couple of days but I'm hoping to start this review shortly. All the best. No Great Shaker (talk) 06:01, 19 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Result

edit

I love the enthusiasm that shines through this article. I have to admit I knew nothing at all about the subject although I had vaguely heard of afrobeats. I found the article informative and interesting; so, as a reader has learned something he didn't know before, the article must be fit for purpose.

I made a few small tweaks as I worked my way through, but nothing of any significance – just being a gnome, really. It's fine on all counts. The only thing lacking is a few images but as afrobeats is still relatively new, I appreciate the difficulty given copyright restrictions.

I'm promoting the article to GA. Very well done. No Great Shaker (talk) 13:38, 19 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! What kind of pictures would make sense? I know they need to be 'free to use'. I was thinking of looking around for some pics of artists that are talked about within the article at some point. Madbrad200 (talk) 15:15, 19 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Madbrad200: Congrats on your GA nomination and subsequent promotion. I must also applaud you for creating the article. The following images listed below can be used in the article. They have all been licensed under a creative commons license.
@Versace1608:I added a few, mind checking over them? I was gonna add the Eazi one but it seemed out of place too. Thanks! Madbrad200 (talk) 15:28, 22 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
@Madbrad200: The images look great. What do you think about replacing Davido's image with this image of Fuse ODG in the Azonto and dance crazes section? A good portion of the first paragraph is about Fuse OGD's impact in the U.K. Davido's image go underneath, similar to how it is here.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 14:25, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Reply