Talk:Boxted, Suffolk

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Merge Fenstead End to Here

edit

It has been over a year since Fenstead End was suggested merging with this article, however no discussion has taken place.

Fenstead End is a tiny hamlet within Boxted Parish. It has no real notability, there is not alot that could be written about it anyway, and it is a strong candidate for AFD. The only reference the article has is an atlas, just to prove the place even exists. The these minor hamlets fit most comfortably into the article about their parish.

Merging is the most sensible option and is in keeping with many other similar articles.

--Rushton2010 (talk) 18:11, 15 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Boxted, Suffolk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)Reply