Talk:Bude Canal

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK Waterways Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Waterways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of UK Waterways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UK WaterwaysWikipedia:WikiProject UK WaterwaysTemplate:WikiProject UK WaterwaysUK Waterways articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cornwall Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:

Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Bude Canal map.

Editing

about a month ago I added a sentence to the first paragraph of this article saying where the different arms of the canal went , but someone removed it ! I just don't understand this . All very well edit it or embellish it but do not remove it altogether - some reference needed to be made to where the canal actually went !!??

I have now added the sentence back in or what I could remember of it so will you please have the decency to tell me your reasoning before moving it again . If as I assume you are the person who wrote the preceding sentences then your grammar is questionable to say the least and I have changed this too so it actually makes sense ! If you want to keep the article to yourself then you'd be better off setting up your own web site ! The whole idea of Wikipedia is an interactive forum where people are free to add and edit atricles and discuss them . I hope you will respond in a positive manner or else I'll have to report you . So there ! I look forward to hearing from you on this discussion page !

kittyalex 10:09, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Coordinates

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It's not advisable, as at present, to use a single set of coordinates for a linear feature like a canal. Please see Manchester Ship Canal and Netherton Tunnel Branch Canal for examples of alternative methods of presenting coordinates in such articles. Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 11:02, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Hobbacott plane

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article states: The full bucket had to be heavy enough to pull a loaded tub boat up the 1 in 4½ gradient as well as overcoming friction, so a weight of at least five tons was necessary, and the stroke had to be at least the length of the incline, 935 feet. This cannot be right, as the top of the incline was only about 235 ft above sea level, and so the bottom of the pit would be 700 ft below sea level, and there would be nowhere for the waste water to run. Sensibly, the shaft would be around 225 ft deep, as suggested by Harris (The Grand Western Canal), so the water could run into the lower pound. Harris also states 15 tons for the weight of water. Some gearing would be required. Any comments? Bob1960evens 10:15, 4 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

painting of the canal

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/yourpaintings/paintings/moonrise-on-the-old-canal-bude-cornwall-12439

railway

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Was the canal involved with the Bude Canal and Launceston Junction Railway Act 1865?©Geni 21:26, 25 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bude Canal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.ncdc.gov.uk/index.cfm?articleid=27337
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.ncdc.gov.uk/index.cfm?articleid=28157
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120717003833/http://www.ncdc.gov.uk/ to http://www.ncdc.gov.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:05, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic