Talk:Emperor Duzong

Latest comment: 3 years ago by AnOpenBook in topic Potential neutral point of view violation

Requested move 1 August 2015

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved as proposed, without opposition. Clearly meets WP:CONCISE. bd2412 T 03:53, 10 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

– Per WP:CONCISE, unnecessary disambiguation terms. Only if there is ambiguity like Emperor Renzong should "of Song" be added. I almost never see "of Song" in English-language books, see Google Ngram: [1], [2], [3] [4] etc., you may also do Google Book searches. Timmyshin (talk) 22:16, 1 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Emperor Zhenzong which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:01, 26 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Family

edit

Please cite references for the family. Fang Quanguang (talk) 00:59, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Potential neutral point of view violation

edit

Certain portions of this article seem to violate WP:NPV, especially in the repeated claims of Emperor Duzong abandoning his duties. Some other examples of this include claims that his "intelligence was lower than a normal person", that his attempts to inquire into the state of the nation were merely a facade, and that historians find his ascension to the position of heir confusing. Although I do not know enough about this subject to properly correct this article, in my opinion it seems to break WP:NPV and so should be changed by someone with knowledge on this subject. AnOpenBook (talk) 02:58, 16 September 2021 (UTC)Reply