Talk:Fu Cong
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
User:Amigao repeated deletion of material
editUser:Amigao seems to misunderstand various wikipedia policies, in an effort to squelch information on this page for the last several days (to 14 April 2023). It would be nice to have an affirmation that @Amigao: has read, understands, and is not in a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Herreshoffian (talk) 14:39, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
- You probably should review WP:BURDEN and WP:ONUS with respect to your attempts to restore unreliable and deprecated sourced material using WP:CGTN. Always better to source statements with WP:GREL. Amigao (talk) 18:27, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Sadly, when given the chance to confirm that s/he is not in a situation of Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, above at 14:39 14 April 2023, User:Amigao decided to persist with the unfortunate WP:EDITWAR conduct, see Revision as of 17:55, 14 April 2023. The use of deprecated material is a topic for separate discussion. @Amigao: This is another chance to come clean on a possible Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. Herreshoffian (talk) 06:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- No COI. Do you have a COI to declare? Also, you should probably review the core policy of WP:OWN. Amigao (talk) 17:00, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Deprecated sources note, for User:Amigao
edit"Deprecated: There is community consensus from a request for comment to deprecate the source. The source is considered generally unreliable, and use of the source is generally prohibited. Despite this, the source may be used for uncontroversial self-descriptions, although reliable secondary sources are still preferred."
The case of Fu Cong fits the bill to allow the use of a deprecated source. Herreshoffian (talk) 06:17, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Deprecated sources can only be used for WP:ABOUTSELF in limited circumstances. If you'd like further opinions on deprecated content, see: WP:RSN. Amigao (talk) 16:55, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Sorry, @Amigao: I'm not writing about myself. Are you throwing out red herrings on purpose or is it a lack of comprehension on your part? Herreshoffian (talk) 07:29, 16 April 2023 (UTC)