I've got a Latin letter by a Polish author from 1637 that refers to him as Dlugissus. I'm not sure if this was an error on the part of the author himself or the editor of the anthology it's in, or whether that's another accepted Latin version of Długosz. The editor himself in a footnote claims little knowledge of Długosz and refers to a Historia Polonica, so it's perfectly liable to be an editorial mistake. I take it that the evidence for Dlugossius is from his own writings? Tsunomaru (talk) 15:35, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply