This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Algeria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Algeria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AlgeriaWikipedia:WikiProject AlgeriaTemplate:WikiProject AlgeriaAlgeria articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Which Berber language did she speak? I'd assume it was the Kabyle language, but the source doesn't say.
None of the sources specified.
Consider using "Tamazight" instead of "Berber", as the latter has colonial connotations.
Berber is used pretty universally on Wikipedia.
"he her" Is there a missing word here?
Fixed.
Spotcheck: [5] Verified the sentence about her father's understanding of Islam. But "She never left Islam, but she distanced herself from the religion as a teenager because she felt unwelcome as a woman" seems like it may not be entirely accurate to the source. If the section of the source I'm looking at is the correct one, it says: "Not feeling in tune with what is practised in today's mosques, especially those that claim to be Salafist, the young woman decided to open her own place of worship." That is quite different than her feeling unwelcome due to her gender, it seems to imply a theological disagreement with Salafism.
It's referring to a lower paragraph about when she was a teenager.
"She took interest in the law's adherence to Sharia," Might be worth clarifying that this is Algerian law, as I was a bit confused for a moment.
Done.
"but also that in her view" This is a bit of an odd way to tie these to things together in one sentence. I'd recommend just starting a new sentence with "In her view,".
Spotcheck: [1][5] Verified, although Le Point does actually say that it was the "most conservative fringe of the Muslim community", so it may be worth being more specific just so we're not implying it applies to conservative Muslims as a whole.
Reworded to "the most conservative adherents of Islam", but I'd be open to a better wording.
What happened to the Fatima Mosque after lockdown and pandemic restrictions were lifted? This says it became less active online, did that coincide with a return to public activity?
There's been disappointingly little coverage after that burst when she was founding the mosque in 2019–2020. I added that "it came to focus on a smaller group of members", though I don't love this wording either.
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
References are all impeccably formatted and presented.
B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
All reliable sources are cited inline with the information they're verifying.
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Very neutral, even when discussing contentious subjects.
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
No changes since its GA nominations, only major edits have been carried out by the nominator. Only reversion in its history was a procedural reversion of a category change.
Leading image is an original photo by DeuxPlusQuatre, released under a Creative Commons license. Second image is from an Oumma video interview, which was published under a Creative Commons license.
Both images are of the article's subject. They're suitably captioned, but could perhaps do with a little more information and would benefit from alt text.
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Fantastic work on this article TBUA! I learnt a lot reading this and found it a very interesting process. The only issues I have found that would prevent it from passing are a couple prose issues with clarity and a grammatical error, a couple cases where the text may not fit with what the source says, and a possible gap where more up-to-date information could be useful. Once these have been seen to, I'll be happy to give it another look. --Grnrchst (talk) 12:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.