Talk:Kent Fortress Royal Engineers

Kent Fortress formation date

This article states that the unit was formed in 1932. This is not correct. The Royal Engineers (Kent Fortress) existed as a territorial unit prior to the First World War in 1914. My grandfather was a member of the unit prior to signing up with the regular army in September 1914.

Mylesfrancis (talk) 11:36, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

This site [1] supports the above. It may be that the unit was disbanded and then re-formed. I'll add a note to the article and follow it up when I can. The original info is sourced as stated. Folks at 137 (talk) 22:09, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Kent Fortress Royal Engineers/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Article assessed as start class. To achieve B class:- It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. = yes It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. = ?? (It does appear to cover the topic, but this is outside my area of knowledge to say for definite that there are no major ommissions) It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. = yes It is free from major grammatical errors. = yes It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. = no Comment:- Pictures would help improve the article - e.g. insignia. Were there any medals awarded to members of the KFRE? If so, a section could be added covering this. Mjroots (talk) 10:02, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Last edited at 10:03, 26 January 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 21:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Kent Fortress Royal Engineers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141204232852/http://orbat.com/site/uk_orbats/ to http://orbat.com/site/uk_orbats/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150210182616/http://british-army-units1945on.co.uk/territorial-army-royal-engineers/regiments-118-432-territorial-army.html to http://british-army-units1945on.co.uk/territorial-army-royal-engineers/regiments-118-432-territorial-army.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141204232852/http://orbat.com/site/uk_orbats/ to http://orbat.com/site/uk_orbats/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141204232852/http://orbat.com/site/uk_orbats/ to http://orbat.com/site/uk_orbats/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150829181242/https://british-army-units1945on.co.uk/ to http://british-army-units1945on.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:14, 4 May 2017 (UTC)