This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dorset, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics connected with Dorset. If you would like to participate, you can visit the WikiProject Dorset project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.DorsetWikipedia:WikiProject DorsetTemplate:WikiProject DorsetDorset articles
Talk:Mary Anning is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Latest comment: 15 days ago11 comments2 people in discussion
I am an academic at the University of Exeter, currently conducting research into oral histories of events that subsequently turn into source-histories of paranormal phenomena. I have previously published on inaccuracies in historical accounts that are then widely adopted (cf ttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/metrics/10.1080/03080188.2023.2249208). As a local resident of Lyme Regis, I have been researching the history of Martha Drower, a 15 year old girl who died in the lightning strike of 19th August 1800 that Mary Anning survived. I have discovered more information on the incident that might be useful and interesting to add to the 'early childhood' section of this page but cannot gain edit access yet. Any information on how to do so would be appreciated. Adewebbexeter (talk) 12:04, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
That was my own assessment: you do indeed have sources. Some academics, or purported academics, who want to add content to articles, do so without being able to point to published sources. Sorry for the misunderstanding; I believe I may have been thinking in terms of my edit here.
Probably just a sentence to expand the lightning incident with the additional detail. Shall I add it here with the references in the right format perhaps? Adewebbexeter (talk) 20:16, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi. I've contacted the archivist to check for permissions on use of the digital image of the burial report. As soon as they come back, I will let you know. Adewebbexeter (talk) 07:49, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
I believe documents which are a) pure text with no creative input, b) product of a government, and c) over two centuries old, can be reasonably assumed to be in the public domain. DS (talk) 21:19, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
The EULA of the archive website looks a bit strict and also the viewer (that isn't linkable) is somewhat small so will wait to see if they can provide a better digital permalink. Thanks though. Useful to know. I have also asked for a file that is not hosted digitally in the archive that is the inquest into the lightning strike that Anning survived and her nurse + 2 were killed. That may be more revealing. Adewebbexeter (talk) 21:30, 2 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
level-5 vital article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
