Punk

edit

I've removed the reference to the album being cited as an influence by punks such as Lydon. We hear this all the time, but it won't do here without a citation. I doubt that even Lydon has ever referred specifically to this album. He's mentioned his --feline1 09:03, 27 September 2006 (UTC)liking for Hammill in interviews, sure, but I think he was referring to a certain attitude rather than specifically to the music. What's more remarkable to me is Hammill's own pioneering use of the word 'punk' on the sleevenotes, and I've added a line on this. --Richardrj talk email 13:36, 26 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

actually he did specifically refer to it - I believe it was on a Captial Radio broadcast (where Lydon may even have been picking his favourite tunes and played a Hammill track?), and I believe this is cited in print in Jon Savage's "England's Dreaming" http://www.amazon.co.uk/Englands-Dreaming-Jon-Savage/dp/0571227201/sr=8-1/qid=1159280263/ref=sr_1_1/202-3804803-8167844?ie=UTF8&s=books
As for using "punk" - have you read Lester Bangs' "The Screwtape Letters" (in the "Psycotic Reactions and Carburettor Dung" anthology) which attempts to trace the etmyology/priority of usage for the term?

--feline1 14:19, 26 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for that. I have a copy of the Savage book at home so will check that tonight. And no, I haven't read the Bangs - and to be honest I'll stick with the OED for an authoritative etymology of the word! --Richardrj talk email 14:23, 26 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
No, no mention of Hammill at all in the Savage book. Not disputing that Lydon is/was a PH fan, but we need a source before it can go in the article. --Richardrj talk email 07:24, 27 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Hmmm, I know I read it *somewhere* though - wonder where it was. Perhaps Lydon's autobiography (which I haven't read) would be the best place to check, though.
Found it - it was actually the Simon Reynolds book on post-punk (which I must get around to reading). I've added a reference here and in PH's article. --Richardrj talk email 13:49, 9 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Peter Hammill Nadir's Big Chance.jpg

edit
 

Image:Peter Hammill Nadir's Big Chance.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:15, 15 January 2008 (UTC)Reply