Talk:Peoria Notre Dame High School

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Notable Alumni

edit

Just been pondering this section. There are two graduates from Peoria Notre Dame who went on to play basketball in college and were successful at it. But does that rise to the level to make them notable or famous? For example, I can't find any references on Google to Jim Green who played at U of I for two years in the mid-1980's, and his inclusion in the section seems a bit obscure. On the other hand, Brian Randle at least has an actual Wikipedia entry, although maybe that has more to do with the fact that he become an important basketball player at that university in recent years rather than two decades ago. Do these sorts of entries belong in the section? Does anyone else have thoughts on the matter. Doesn't seem to hurt to leave them included, while at the same time, at least one of them doesn't seem notable, and keeping non-notable individuals gives the overall impression that the section is a bit of a "stretch". -- AzureCitizen 14:46, 7 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Based on the above and the fact that it's been quite some time, went ahead and removed one of the entries for practical notability and sourcing concerns.--AzureCitizen (talk) 17:35, 16 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:PND.gif

edit
 

Image:PND.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:53, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

September 2014 cleanup

edit

Editors should be aware, when considering reliable sources, that Peoria Notre Dame has a history of requiring its faculty and students to insert administration-chosen views into the news media. I've removed a large number of claims, tagged many more, and rewritten some sections of this article, most of which didn't even have cursory sources. The article appears to suffer from a rash of stale Wikipedia:Recentism about 2006–2007 and associated confusing relative time claims like "currently" and "the past 7 years" without an indication of when "currently" was. Explanations of removals too long to fit in the edit summary:

"the school was the first high school in the country to offer an online learning day in lieu of a typical weather-related closure garnering local, regional, and national attention."
Just plain wrong. The cited Peoria Journal Star article only mentioned one class and only said that it was first for Notre Dame. No evidence of more than one class, let alone a "day", or for having any attention beyond the PJS; and the claim of being the first in the country is provably and openly false. See, for example:
  • Block, Melissa (March 07, 2007 4:00 PM ET). "No Snow Day for You: Log On to Homeroom". All Things Considered (Audio and transcript). National Public Radio. Retrieved 2014-08-18. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help) A whole news segment in 2007 about a school where online snow days were already the norm. And according to the Wayback Machine, the NPR story was already posted at its still-current address by February 2008, 2 years before the class happened at Notre Dame, so whoever posted this to Wikipedia had full access to know the claim was false before they posted it.
  • Hollingsworth, Heather (2011-07-17 5:12 am EDT). "Virtual Snow Days? Schools Experiment With Online Lessons During Bad Weather". Associated Press. Retrieved 2014-08-18. The first experiments with virtual snow days began a few years ago as individual teachers started logging on during poor weather to drill older students. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
"The Irish Nation." ... "In addition, the creation of the Irish Nation reinvigorated school spirit and made sporting events at PND much more lively"
Unsourced, self-congratulatory paragraph about some school spirit thing in 2006.
"The Peoria Notre Dame High School dance team has placed in the top 5 of state dance competitions for the past 7 years. The Peoria Notre Dame High School cheerleaders consistently place in state and local competitions. The school is known as being a local leader in soccer."
Old unsourced edits with no indication of which "past 7 years" or what is "consistent", followed by dodgy passive voice "is known" to avoid having to declare a source.
Notable alumni
All were unsourced (with some still living, therefore WP:BLP), and all from pre-1988 so provably non-PND students, most already listed in the Academy of Our Lady/Spalding Institute article. (PND's leadership would certainly feel entitled to inheriting everything before 1988 that would make them look good, but it's not Wikipedia's job to align itself with PND's marketing choices.)

--Closeapple (talk) 00:10, 19 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Peoria Notre Dame High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:05, 14 January 2016 (UTC)Reply