Talk:Staples

Latest comment: 5 years ago by JHunterJ in topic Requested move 14 April 2019

Requested move 14 April 2019

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move, particularly with the commenterss consideration of staple food. -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:53, 22 April 2019 (UTC)Reply


Additional changes:

  • In conjunction with these page move requests, it is also requested that the page Staples become a redirect for Staples Inc.

Reason:

Post-move cleanup:

  • The “Staples Inc.” page would have a hatnote cross referencing the “staple” page (which is currently the “staple (fastener)” page) as a singular form of the word “staples” because the word “Staples” would redirect to the “Staples Inc.” page. The “Staples Inc.” page would also have a hatnote linking to the “staples (disambiguation)” page.
Rubbish. People refer to staples as a plural all the time. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:49, 17 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, sorry to be equally blunt but neither statement by Lazz_R makes much sense. The food is at least a contender, if not a better candidate, for primary based on page views and long-term significance, but somehow that's "no reason whatsoever". No idea what the thought process is for "staples" not being used very commonly as a plural. -- Fyrael (talk) 14:18, 17 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.