Talk:Super Bowl

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Otr500 in topic External links


"2029 Super Bowl" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect 2029 Super Bowl has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 16 § 2029 Super Bowl until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Super Bowl 64" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Super Bowl 64 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 16 § Super Bowl 64 until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Super Bowl LXIV" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Super Bowl LXIV has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 16 § Super Bowl LXIV until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

"2030 Super Bowl" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect 2030 Super Bowl has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 16 § 2030 Super Bowl until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:07, 16 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit
Section review: Removed links that were either book advertising, showing absolutely nothing "unique", or dead links.
  • ELpoints #3): Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
  • LINKFARM: There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
  • ELMIN: Minimize the number of links. --
  • ELCITE: Do not use {{cite web}} or other citation templates in the External links section. Citation templates are permitted in the Further reading section.
Please note: