2601AC47

Userboxes This user was editing Wikipedia without a registered account for a long time before they created one. In an emergency, this user may be slapped with a trout. 1This user refuses to apply the adjective "unique" to anything that is not the only one of its kind! Beware! This user is a known WikiJaguar. This user thinks you can learn a lot by editing an Encyclopedia. This user helped promote Dr Disrespect to good article status. This user strives to maintain a policy of neutrality on controversial issues. This user participates in WikiProject Film. This user is a participant in WikiProject Video games. SelloutThis user watches the Super Bowl for the ads. This user is interested in sociology. This user HATES winter. This user contributes to Wikipedia on a Chromebook. This user never tries to kill time as they can always find productive things to do that occupy them Even Jimbo (the founder) knows how to make a appearance when you ask him. In fact, alongside Beeswaxcandle, Cwmhiraeth, Doc James, Nacaru, Primefac, ScottishFinnishRadish, ThunderingTyphoons, Vermont and Xaosflux, I stalk and judicature their talk pages, and altogether, wish to form a dream jury. This user drinks tea. This user is a participant in WikiProject Articles for improvement. This user is a member of WikiProject Cleanup. This user assists at the dispute resolution noticeboard. This user believes that we should do no harm on any biographical article. This user volunteers at the Wikipedia Help Desk. This user believes that the universe began with a big bang when God said, Let there be light.

---

My signature: 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon

For other people named 2601:, see [[:Special:ListUsers?username=2601:]].

#SaveBlinx (and wait for a 3rd game, hopefully by 2027 or sooner) Also, I have exactly 402 pages on my watchlist; specifically, 5 categories, 12 WPs, 11 users and 374 articles.

---

* [Pages relating to the Shakespeare authorship question; remembered?]

MAIL ME ONLY IF IT'S ABSOLUTELY URGENT AND YOU HAVE NO OTHER CHOICE... AND IF I'M WATCHING STRANGER THINGS, PLAYING FORTNITE OR BUSY ELSEWHERE.

Your GA nomination of Dr Disrespect

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Dr Disrespect you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ca -- Ca (talk) 14:41, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Your signature

Greetings! I've noted your signature includes a span statement setting the color of the text of your username to be HTML gold (Hex: #FFD700). This color against a white background has a color contrast of 1.4:1. You can check this yourself at https://webaim.org/resources/contrastchecker/. Note that per Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.4.3, a minimum contrast of 4.5:1 is required. While you are under no requirement to follow WCAG, it is part of our guidelines as well (see WP:SIGAPP). I recommend you change the color in your signature to something that complies with the 4.5:1 contrast ratio. It's just good practice. I have no visual impairments, but even I have difficulty reading your signature. --Hammersoft (talk) 17:46, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

 Done 2601AC47 (talk|contribs) Isn't a IP anon 17:51, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Close. 4.3:1 :) Can I suggest #7E790E? --Hammersoft (talk) 18:07, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

 Done? Either way, gold's a good look. 2601AC47 (talk|contribs) Isn't a IP anon 18:09, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

I appreciate your willingness to change this! Accessibility on the web is something most people haven't even heard of, much less care about. Thank you! --Hammersoft (talk) 18:19, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dr Disrespect

The article Dr Disrespect you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Dr Disrespect and Talk:Dr Disrespect/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ca -- Ca (talk) 14:02, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

Your revert of revision 1259389166

I sincerely believe your revert to be erroneous. The image that I replaced the previous image with is visually identical; it solely differs in its file format. In fact, I was performing a non-free reduction that was requested on A Minecraft Movie poster.jpg. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rossel44 (talk • contribs) 22:23, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

I see. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 22:24, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes#Requirements to accept an edit, when to accept an edit
  

Elli (talk | contribs) 02:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. I promise to be careful with this power. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 02:37, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dr Disrespect

The article Dr Disrespect you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Dr Disrespect for comments about the article, and Talk:Dr Disrespect/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ca -- Ca (talk) 23:44, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Your recent warnings

I have reverted your warnings to AceSevenFive (talk · contribs) and 135.12.162.209 (talk · contribs) because I believe they were inappropriate and an "only warning" template is no small thing.

Could you explain what disruptive behaviour you believe both users to have engaged in?

In the case of the IP user, you cited their edit to the DRN - but that edit was to post what appears to be a perfectly legitimate request for dispute resolution. In the case of AceSevenFive, you didn't cite anything specific, and I can see nothing disruptive in their recent edit history, much less anything that would warrant telling them they "may be blocked from editing without further warning". AntiDionysius (talk) 19:20, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

A minute case of downright disbelief over it. It just seems off that they would go straight to DRN instead of, say, BLPN. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 19:22, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

There's nothing wrong with going to DRN; it's an option presented to editors in the case of content disputes. I personally think it would be better if they went to BLPN because the case would likely get resolved quicker, sure, but picking DRN - especially if you're an IP user who might not understand the significance of BLP or know BLP exists - is okay and definitely not evidence of bad faith, let alone "only warning" territory.

What did AceSevenFive do? AntiDionysius (talk) 19:33, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

As a help desk watcher, I didn't know until the IP came in. I checked both users and the article talk out. And in ASF's case, I got tipped early signs of sealioning. Again, I got sort of disillusioned. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 19:40, 27 November 2024 (UTC)