Geneus01
Welcome
editWelcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
Date
editHello, wondered if you could revisit this edit as the date in the reference is invalid. Thanks. Keith D (talk) 14:49, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Well spotted - thanks --Geneus01 (talk) 17:37, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
Sandpit editing
edit@BrownHairedGirl:Hi BrownHairedGirl - I am still very new to creating my own articles, which in the sandbox exist in various states of development. I was particularly intrigued by your turning off the categories I had started with (birth and death years). Why was that? Does it load the system even before it gets to be in a public place?Geneus01 (talk) 19:15, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not the person you were addressing, but yes, pages in draftspace or userspace should not be included in content categories like Category:1934 births, as these categories are only intended for mainspace articles. You can disable the categories by prefixing them with a colon or with the use of {{draft categories}}. See WP:DRAFTNOCAT and WP:USERNOCAT for more information. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 22:53, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
editHello Geneus01, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Gordon Philip Bowker have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:45, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
@Diannaa: Noted with thanks – I had a (false) mindset that as Wikipedia articles are derived from secondary sources, that you could lift whole sections so long as they are properly attributed – but I see that was not enough (I had got lazy and effectively plagiarised). I’m sorry you had to pick this up but grateful that you did (for my learning).... much to learn....Geneus01 (talk) 19:51, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Diannaa: Had another go at this, adding a little to content but greatly strengthening the citations through independent sources. I hope this survives close scrutiny through you now.Geneus01 (talk) 08:20, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- The current version is okay from a copyright point of view.— Diannaa (talk) 13:02, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Linking to a Draft article
editYou have recently inserted a number of wikilinks into existing articles which point to an existing Draft article. Please do not do this. All the additions have been reverted. Articles may only be linked once they have been reviewed and accepted into mainspace. Thank you. Velella Velella Talk 09:02, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks @Velella: - I learn as I stumble. Geneus01 (talk) 14:57, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 15
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sonata on the 94th Psalm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyperion. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
- Good call... Geneus01 (talk) 07:47, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
Ways to improve George Harold Winterbottom
editHello, Geneus01,
Thank you for creating George Harold Winterbottom.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Thank you for this well developed article: would you mind expanding the lede to encompass more of the points in the prose?
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Schminnte}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Schminnte (talk • contribs) 17:19, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Schminnte: Thanks for this - what I had published was effectively a tagline, not a lead. I have now corrected that (if you agree). I hope that improves the overall quality of the article. Much appreciated. Geneus01 (talk) 06:50, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- That seems a lot better now, thanks. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 10:00, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 17
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gerald Case, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bernie and Dark Journey.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 17 September 2023 (UTC)