User talk:Guapoaaron/Two-step flow of communication/Icedcoffee14 Peer Review
Hi! I am a student at the University of Pittsburgh at Greensburg and I am supposed to peer review this article. When I first read about the Two-step flow of communication, I thought that it was helpful to see the picture of how it works. I think that this will also help other readers understand how it works as well. I also thought the information of how it was founded and who the founding fathers were was also very descriptive and it added to my understanding of what the Two-step flow is. Something that I didn't see in this article was any current research or examples of how this is portrayed in our world. I think that these are both important aspects because it seems that Two-step flow is relevant in today's media and I think that by adding current research, it will help readers understand how it takes effect. Also, I think examples from the past can also be helpful because it will show readers how Two-step flow has evolved over time.Another thing that I thought could be changed is the section of where published works are. I think that it would be more helpful if there were published works that included academic journals and peer reviewed articles instead of magazines that could be known to be biased. I think that by adding academic journals, it will help make this Wikipedia page more credible.
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "User:Guapoaaron/Two-step flow of communication/Icedcoffee14 Peer Review" page.
