Austin smith

edit

Hi. I declined your speedy deletion nomination of Austin smith as he is clearly a notable person, as asserted in the original article. Before tagging pages for speedy deletion it is a good idea to do a quick check on google first. Thanks --Pontificalibus (talk) 14:11, 13 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Kinism

edit
 

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Kinism. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kinism (3rd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:14, 31 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Glimcher Realty Trust

edit

Hello Horselover Frost, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Glimcher Realty Trust, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:24.161.150.67. This has been done because the page seems to be about a person, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:24.161.150.67. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of 24.161.150.67 (talk · contribs) 00:36, 26 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sago worms

edit

Thanks for your answer. It might be a roundabout way, but I live in the Netherlands, so if you know a company that ships there, I can send it along to my American friend. He also seems to have a couple of friends in Thailand if that helps...- 194.60.106.17 (talk) 09:35, 31 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

PS My IP is not fixed. Please reply here or on the reference desk. - 194.60.106.17 (talk) 09:35, 31 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

New Page Patrol survey

edit
 

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello Horselover Frost! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Horselover Frost. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply