RevDel request

edit

Hi. Any idea about this ES?102.173.223.161 (talk) 18:29, 15 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Page has been deleted. Primefac (talk) 18:32, 15 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

My article is not displayed on search engines

edit

Good evening Primefac ,

How are you ? well I hope

I would like to tell you that my articleCercle d’études scientifiques Pierre Rayer — Wikipédia (wikipedia.org) does not appear on search engines, can you solve the problem for me please?

Inspiringflow (talk) 21:48, 16 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker) Hello, Inspiringflow,
Wikipedia has no control over how Google or Bing! or other search engines display their search results. It could take days, weeks or months for a Wikipedia article to appear on a search engine results page. Liz Read! Talk! 01:28, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Inspiringflow (talk page watcher) When creating articles about your own organisation you are, ipso facto, a paid editor. I have warned you and your surrogate account to comply with WP:PAID and given you both(!) the strong suggestion not to use two accounts. But you will know this already.
Wikipedia doesn't care much about search engines. They tend to index articles reasonably fast, although there is probably an unspecified delay to disappoint spammers. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 17:39, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Cercle d'Études Scientifiques Pierre Rayer

edit

You were kind to a new user (in your edit summary). That was a truly good thing to do. No good deed goes unpunished, I fear.

However this new user is a (presumed) good faith sock of Inspiringflow, to whom JBW has made a strong suggestion that they desist. I've moved the article back to Draft, warned both about UPE, and left each {{uw-agf-sock}} although this feels more deliberate than that template warrants.

There is discussion on my user talk page about the editor and the article/draft. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 07:38, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the update. I looked at your talk page and don't think I need to comment any, seems like good advice has been given all around. Primefac (talk) 13:26, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello Primefac ,
I have just made changes to the article in question and I would like to have your feedback on it if it is good or not; also regarding the two accounts underlined above it was an error on my part and I have already explained myself on that, Waiting for your return, thank you Inspiringflow (talk) 13:21, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Please remove my AWB access

edit

I don't remember when I last used AWB/JWB, and don't foresee myself requiring its use in the future. I'm not sure why I asked for AWB access first place. No point in having access, as such. Thanks! JavaHurricane 21:45, 22 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Done. Primefac (talk) 12:46, 23 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

RFA2024 update: Discussion-only period now open for review

edit

Hi there! The trial of the RfA discussion-only period passed at WP:RFA2024 has concluded, and after open discussion, the RfC is now considering whether to retain, modify, or discontinue it. You are invited to participate at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase II/Discussion-only period. Cheers, and happy editing! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply