Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Wildthing61476 14:55, 10 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from articles that you have created yourself. You may place {{hangon}} on the page and make your case on the article's talk page if you oppose an article's speedy deletion. Thanks. Wildthing61476 15:07, 10 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages such as Duke Street Firm. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Wildthing61476 20:15, 10 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

You have made an edit to Ryan mcgowan that could be regarded as defamatory. Please do not restore this material to the article or its talk page without full citations supporting every statement. If you do, you may be blocked for disruption. (The official policy for Wikipedia is Verifiability, not truth.) See the blocking policy for more information. Wildthing61476 20:35, 10 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from an article, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wildthing61476 20:37, 10 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Merope Talk 20:44, 10 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

vandalising the page

edit

How did i vandalise the page you fucking dickhead.What did i do wrong to it arsehole?

Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by administrators or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. Rsm99833 00:15, 12 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

WeeAaron (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

fukin arseholes dicks cunts die u priks

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • I have reset your block to not expire. Thus far you have created an attack page with no trace of sources, attacked the administrator who deleted it, and then attacked those who told you that this was wrong. The phrase "stitch this" springs to mind. You'll not be unblocked until there is evidence that you intend to use Wikipedia for something other than insults and attacks. Guy 13:17, 12 October 2006 (UTC)Reply


unblock

edit

please unblock me and i will be good and only edit articles that have the need to be edited.