Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Sharrma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 17:56, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Abhishek Sharrma

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP1E.Quasi-trivial character, at best.TOOSOON. ∯WBG^converse 12:53, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 14:59, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 14:59, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep passes WP:GOLDENRULE. Have notability in reliable sources. The references are about the subject and not just a minute mention. Accesscrawl (talk) 15:57, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and a violation of WP:ToU. GSS (talk|c|em) 16:52, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - subject fails WP:NACTOR and falls within WP:TOOSOON territory. Being a child actor, it is almost impossible for the subject to have either "had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions" or "Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment" as laid down by NACTOR. It should also be noted that the vast weight of the article's sourcing concerns the film Tumhari Sulu and not the subject himself, who is often mentioned in passing, in a few sentences, or as part of the broader cast.--SamHolt6 (talk) 17:00, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also noting that the article creator has been blocked for sock puppetry.--SamHolt6 (talk) 16:21, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If there is one thing that is meaningless it is the term "child actor". Does this mean a 16-year-old or a 6-year-old. The article does not even hint which one it is. The closer to the latter, the stronger the arguments to delete. For either though, we need sustained, specific coverage about Sharrma, not just about films that starred other people. The article does not even convince me that Sharrma's role in even one film was significant. More to the point, it makes clear he only had one role in a notable production. When you are barrell bottoming by mentions of TV commericals to try to show notability it just does not exist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:57, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete too soon to be on Wikipedia. had he been in more films, we could have his article here. Dial911 (talk) 16:25, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.