Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexandre Robicquet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandre Robicquet

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Current sources doesn't pass WP:GNG Cuoxo (talk) 13:54, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cuoxo (talk) 13:54, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:03, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:03, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:03, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet our notability guidelines for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:44, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails our standards for models and academics. Please convince me he passes based on the intersection. Bearian (talk) 18:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. He has some high-citation publications, but they tail off very quickly, they have many authors, and he seems to have left academia for industry without spending enough time to develop a notable academic career. I don't think a single-digit h-index in a high-citation field is enough for WP:PROF#C1 unless there is more to say than that he was briefly a member of a high-performing research group. And beyond that, there seems to be little else that rises to the level of notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:30, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.