- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:28, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Amnon Golan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article is a puff piece that breached Wikipedia's policies on BLPs. Peacock terms are used often in the language, while being unsourced with little to no third-party information to be found on the person. There are no other mention of this person on the Y&R website, except for his own LinkedIn. Mr Borkman (talk) 15:22, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CptViraj (talk) 16:22, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:28, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:GNG. Clear WP:PROMO piece. KidAd talk 18:20, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- Delete/WP:USERFY as does not pass WP:N. Among cited sources, I see no WP:RS. However, for living persons, especially relatively young ones, I think WP:USERFY is usually better than deletion because they could eventually become notable.— Ad Meliora Talk∕Contribs 19:08, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
- Speedy delete - no allegation of notability, nor any sources at all, in violation of WP:BLP. Bearian (talk) 00:40, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.