Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Rita Centura

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Rita Centura

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Proposed deletion declined by paid editor. PROD'ed as "There is no coverage in independent, reliable sources. The subject's most notable exhibition is the Florence biennial, which is a pay-to-exhibit event. Does not come close to meeting the notability guidelines for artists, WP:ARTIST" those concerns remain. Vexations (talk) 15:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Vexations (talk) 15:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Vexations (talk) 15:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:50, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:50, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:56, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I am not finding anything in a BEFORE search to substantiate notability, just her own website & social media posts, which do not count towards notability. No museum collections nor in-depth critical, art-historical coverage in reliable sources. Does not meet criteria for WP:NARTIST nor WP:GNG. Netherzone (talk) 16:33, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete GNG and NARTIST fail. Possibly (talk) 16:58, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST. There's also the UPE issue. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:20, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There are no secondary and reliable sources with significant coverage about the artist. And I didn't see any signs of complying with WP: ARTIST. ✍A.WagnerC (talk) 18:30, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per NARTST, GNG, WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:SNOW. I found zero hits on Google newspapers. She has no works in major collections or museums. She has fifty-one (51) followers on Twitter under @arcentura, and most of those are animal rights groups, not fans of her art. We are not a social media account or free web service, and in 2021, everyone knows that after our 20 years in existence. There seems to be unanimous accord to delete this page. I would need a lot to convince me to change my mind. Bearian (talk) 01:38, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.