Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annika Hinze

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. – Joe (talk) 18:03, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Annika Hinze

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe it is WP:TOOSOON for this particular scholar to be notable - associate professor, low citations in scholar, no major awards or positions that would meet WP:NACADEMIC, I looked but did not find substantial coverage of her in independent RS. Fyddlestix (talk) 15:17, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 15:17, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 15:17, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand -related deletion discussions. Fyddlestix (talk) 15:18, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:03, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:03, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet any of the many notabiluity criteria for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:15, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.