Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blood Shadowed Court

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Vampire: The Eternal Struggle#Sets and expansions. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:39, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blood Shadowed Court

This product is a repackaging of earlier product, and is not notable. Deprodded. Abductive (talk) 20:12, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Vampire: The Eternal Struggle#Sets and expansions. Most of the expansion sets for this game have pages, but I can find no evidence of notability for this one. I wouldn't object to the material being merged into a combination article with several other sets, but it certainly doesn't need a stand-alone article. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:39, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- (X! · talk) · @928 · 21:16, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 23:49, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't take any stand whether this article should be kept or not, but if it is changed into a redirect then it should point to Camarilla Edition, as this set reprints only crypt cards from that expansion. --Jhattara ^{(Talk · Contrib)} 07:38, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect I'm really not sure to where, ~~but I think ThaddeusB's target makes a bit more sense~~. Hobit (talk) 17:28, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That would redirect to the entire game, while within the Camarilla Edition article a sub-section for the Blood Shadowed Court could be easily added, without any strayings within the articles. With the BSC article redirecting there no actual information would be lost anywhere within the bitspace, while still cleaning the Wikipedia a bit. --Jhattara ^{(Talk · Contrib)} 07:36, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you are shooting for now. Agreed. Hobit (talk) 13:27, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as per ThaddeusB. --Merovingian (T, C, L) 07:38, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.