Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boots Anson-Roa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Closing based on clear, early consensus. Missvain (talk) 22:28, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Boots Anson-Roa

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This reads like a resumé or cv of a very non-notable person. This article and its subject does not seem to require a standalone article. Perhaps include her name in other articles as appropriate. Spongecob Flairpants (talk) 06:30, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spongecob Flairpants (talk) 06:30, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spongecob Flairpants (talk) 06:30, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Spongecob Flairpants (talk) 06:30, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Spongecob Flairpants (talk) 06:30, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spongecob Flairpants (talk) 06:30, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Spongecob Flairpants (talk) 06:30, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Spongecob Flairpants (talk) 06:30, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am pretty sure this is a keep. She was an actress for 40-somethign years, and lately seems to be something of a celebrity in the Filipino press. On the face of it she looks notable, but the article needs some work and additional sourcing. Possibly (talk) 07:47, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep a notable actress in our country. The article, however, needs major fix and addition of more sources. Deleting this won't help. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:59, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Boots Anson-Rodrigo as the said actress is now married to her second husband. Jayjay2020 (talk) 08:51, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment @Jayjay2020: perhaps you meant move to Boots Anson-Rodrigo. But I doubt that title passes WP:COMMONNAME, as she is more commonly known as Boots Anson-Roa. Immediate Google search reveals that too. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:33, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Nonsensical nomination, anyone with such a long list of film and television credits many of which she has prominent roles would qualify under WP:NACTOR. This is not to mention the wide coverage of her in news sources, indicating a failure of WP:BEFORE and lack of knowledge of deletion policy by the nominator (particularly when the editor has only an editing history of less than a week when nominating the article for deletion). Hzh (talk) 17:59, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed that the nominator has been blocked for long-term abuse. Time to speedy close this nonsensical nomination from a problem editor. Hzh (talk) 22:25, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nominator Spongecob Flairpants has not been blocked (yet). There is an SPI open though. Possibly (talk) 22:55, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: passes WP:NACTOR. — Toughpigs (talk) 19:13, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, a very notable actress in the Philippines with lots of film credits as well as awards. It is now being edited to include reliable sources. --Jojit (talk) 13:39, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep; she is a notable person in the Philippines --Billie bb (talk) 13:45, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Ludicrous nomination. I just checked the history and the (long) awards section was already present when this was nominated. pburka (talk) 17:25, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.