- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:19, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Chris Elrod (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Largely self-edited article about a local pastor sourced only to his own website - no evidence of meeting WP:GNG and a WP:BEFORE search does not provide any significant coverage Melcous (talk) 06:10, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:19, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:19, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Promotional piece. No reliable sources found. Mccapra (talk) 12:34, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Blatant self-promotion. One bit on FOX News about a "Church for Men" he co-founded. Web sites on him and his ministry, lots of pages on social media, but, yeah, I haven't found anything from a reliable or independent source that would support notability. - Donald Albury 12:53, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Cannot find adequate indepedent RS. Article trimmed of unsourced items, leaving about two sentences. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 15:08, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence of notable coverage, appears to be self-promotional Dexxtrall (talk) 12:33, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - run of the mill street missionary. I'm sure he helps people, but a single story about him on an entertainment TV station is not significant coverage. The recent spate of missionary BLP spam endangers own not-for-profit status as a non-sectarian charity. Bearian (talk) 01:44, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.