- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was No consensus defaulting to keep. Tyrenius 18:39, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A resume/autobiography. GregorB 20:27, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete pretty clear vanity. Leibniz 20:30, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Resume abuse of Wikipedia Bwithh 20:37, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - He's for real. Seems notable enough for an entry here, just needs a re-write. PT (s-s-s-s) 20:40, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I'm not sure that cuts it. "Notability can be determined by:
- *Multiple features in popular culture publications such as Vogue, GQ, Elle, FHM or national newspapers
- *A large fan base, fan listing or "cult" following
- *An independent biography
- *Name recognition
- *Commercial endorsements" Leibniz 21:04, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep for being in large-scale, large-audience productions, but the article needs a massive rewrite and wikification. Crystallina 21:09, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- He is listed among the main cast in less than 50 % of the IMDB credits. Punkmorten 22:01, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Extremely weak keep as per Crystallina. User:Zoe|(talk) 22:28, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep per Crystallina. --Metropolitan90 23:06, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.