Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DXAL

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Even if Wikipedia:BROADCAST presents a low bar, it clearly does not consider every radio station in existence as notable. No other claim of notability has been presented. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 16:12, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DXAL

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A7 declined by Espresso Addict on the basis that radio stations are 'usually considered notable'. This is a view not, as far as I can see, supported by WP:BROADCAST or several other A7s that were accepted [1], [2] nor discussions at AFD. However, anyone has the right to refuse a CSD so here we are I suppose. This, like all the other Philippines radio station stubs, has no sources that do anything except demonstrate bare existence. There is not even a claim to notability, let alone the sources to support such a claim. Fails even the quite low standards of WP:BROADCAST and definitely fails WP:GNG. Hug^syrup 13:48, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Hug^syrup 13:48, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Hug^syrup 13:48, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 02:35, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I would agree with Espresso Addict that radio stations are usually considered notable. The station is licensed by the NTC, as per 2019 NTC Listing from FOI. And with at least one external link indicated, the station does exist. Therefore, the article is good enough to pass WP:BROADCAST. I rest my case. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T · ICE CUBE)} 01:26, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:19, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete if all the coverage that can be found is that the station exists, then it should be deleted. We need more than directory entries to write an article. b uidhe 06:40, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. KartikeyaS (talk) 16:06, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.