Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dane Brookes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dane Brookes

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:BIO and WP:NACTOR. Run-of-the-mill actor/businessman. Promotional article, created by a WP:SPA. Edwardx (talk) 23:04, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 02:22, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 02:22, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 02:22, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 02:22, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I also can't find any indication of notability or significant coverage, and the article was very misleading, suggesting he'd 'starred' in four major soaps, whereas actually two actors who between them had done appeared in the short film he directed. I've cleared that up, but the article still claims a series of short film appearances that aren't referenced and haven't found their way into IMDb. Mortee (talk) 20:48, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Seconding the above comment. I searched his name with keywords such as "writer" and "actor" in Google, and all that came up were links under his control. Also, the editor who created this article back in 2008, in addition to many of the editors that touched the page afterward, seem to have only edited this page. While that doesn't necessarily imply conflict of interest on its own, it does in this case given the fact that there's no references included in this article. So where is this information coming from? CanoeUnlined (talk) 03:41, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not pass WP:GNG WP:NACTOR or WP:CREATIVE at this time Atlantic306 (talk) 19:26, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.