Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Hillenbrand

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Killiondude (talk) 06:11, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

David Hillenbrand

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently Cyberbot I couldn't handle two titles in the header, but David Hillenbrand and Scott Hillenbrand should be considered equivalent. Huon (talk) 03:59, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

While David and Scott Hillenbrand have worked on multiple films that appear to be notable, there is next to no media coverage, or coverage in any reliable third-party sources, of them. Both articles cite pretty much the same sources, and the only independent one, a Hollywood Reporter article on a lawsuit they are involved in, does not cover the Hillenbrands in any detail. My Google News searches came up with a David Hillenbrand that's related to the Carnegie Museums, but no detailed coverage of either this David or Scott Hillenbrand. Huon (talk) 21:10, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 01:04, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 01:04, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 01:05, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 01:05, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header. Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:08, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not enough reliable source coverage to show notability for either.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:18, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.