Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Rovics (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 18:58, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

David Rovics

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/David Rovics
• Articles for deletion/David Rovics (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

David Rovics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:GNG. Does not have significant independent coverage. I pruned out a lot of stuff and those were things in Indymedia.org and like which is red in WP:RSP. A good number of !votes in the first AfD years ago were rooted to editor conflict issues as evident from comments. I have done search, and I don't find significant independent coverage of this subject. Some coverage in radical press and some in Indymedia, which we can not use as reliable source. Graywalls (talk) 20:15, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 20:15, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 20:15, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 20:15, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

• Keep. Sufficient coverage exists to satisfy WP:GNG, e.g. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. --Michig (talk) 15:07, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
• Keep as per the coverage identified above in multiple reliable sources such as PopMatters, books, Folkorg, AllMusic and others that shows significant coverage so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is no longer necessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:03, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.