Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Debi Prasad Mishra
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No policy based arguments for keeping Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 16:18, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Debi Prasad Mishra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability, and highly promotional in it's current state. At the very least, WP:TNT is the best option. 4thfile4thrank (talk) 13:08, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. 4thfile4thrank (talk) 13:08, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:15, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:15, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The article is run-of-the-mill career graph of an academician which has no encyclopedic value. Fails WP:N, WP:GNG. RationalPuff (talk) 15:11, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
- Weak delete Might be notable as head of an institute and written multiple textbooks, but I've not done a proper WP:BEFORE to confirm. I think this is the right person: https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?user=BFqFI9sAAAAJ ? However the article looks like might be a case of WP:TNT in any case. -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:22, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete does not meet notability for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:50, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
- It should not be deleted as the contribution of Dr. Mishra is very much substantial in the research as well as academic community in India. Rather constructive suggestions can be provided to prepare the article as per Wikipedia standard.
@John Pack Lambert thinks "Delete does not meet notability for academics" Can you please elaborate exactly why you are reaching upto this conclusion ? My Suggestion: Substantial contribution towards the academia and the society, major research achievement can be added. Nowadays people becoming impatient towards everything. Positive mindset is required for any developmental work. Arpankumarmondal (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 18:01, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.