Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dina Siegel Vann

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 13:32, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dina Siegel Vann

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article may not comply with WP:GNG. Refs are poor (mainly just P.R.). P,TO 19104 (talk) (contributions) 16:00, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all the sources are internal staff biographies from her employers. The article lacks any 3rd party sources at all, let alone ones that are secondary and reliable and that provide indepth coverage, we need multiple sources that fit all of those criteria to justify an article especially about a living person. Just having your employer create staff bios on you does not show you are in any way notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:43, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 19:29, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. ~ Amkgp 💬 19:29, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 12:06, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:34, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:34, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.