Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eli Wilkie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:25, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Eli Wilkie

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An unsourced BLP for over 11 years, with only primary ELs. A search for sources didn't find any significant coverage nor indeed much coverage at all. Mattg82 (talk) 22:42, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 00:49, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 00:49, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 00:49, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the article has no secondary sources and nothing shows that he is notable. Harut111 (talk) 12:50, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nothing at all shows that this musician is at all notable. That this article has lasted so long with no sourcing is a sad commentary on over creation of articles in the past.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:26, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I'm not seeing anything in the first hundred returns of a google search that could bring this poorly written, unsourced biography into the realm of poorly written, sufficiently sourced biographies. Carrite (talk) 12:55, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.