Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erik Rondell

< Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 21:40, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Erik Rondell

edit

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Erik Rondell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Working stunt man, but not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and with only a single potentially significant role, doesn't meet WP:NACTOR. Onel5969 TT me 15:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 15:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 16:21, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - just in response to the personal attack above. How many of your articles have I reviewed, and marked passed as reviewed? Quite a few more than I've had issues with, if you bothered to look before making a baseless accusation. Even those which have been sent to AfD by other Reviewers, before you worked to improve the articles, like Ellen McElduff. Other of your articles, I've had to request revdel on, due to copyright violations (like Gary Hershberger), and have not commented on the notability of. I simply review your articles as they come up in the queue, and when one with questionable comes along, I take appropriate action. Knowing that you will object to what should be handled through a prod, I bring them to AfD. Just today, I approved 2 of your other articles as passing review. Onel5969 TT me 19:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Um, it wasn't a personal attack, the personal attack was when you made weird and untrue accusations about me on another user's talk page! Nice dig about the copyvio del - showing further proof you have animosity towards me. Today you nominated 2 more articles within less than three minutes of each other, not nearly enough time to review and read all page references and external links and decide on the notability of two people, let alone perform detailed searches. I said nothing to you about those first two noms, you're the one who started contention and tried to stir up trouble by making those accusations on another user's page. -- HistoricalAccountings (talk) 19:30, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I already voted keep above but here are my reasons based on subject of article. His role on Twin Peaks should be enough for cult status, and his roles in TP, 24, and many other shows should be enough for WP:NACTOR. I'm not sure if there's a criteria for stuntmen, but all his stunt credits AND work as a stunt co-ordinator in major TV shows and movie franchises over 40 years, along with sourcing, should be enough for WP:GNG. Note: I hope others will agree with my reasons and vote to keep, but if not requesting draftify in advance as am supposed to be on a WikiBreak and probably won't have time to do more work on article or find more sourcing before this closes. -- HistoricalAccountings (talk) 20:17, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I have added some additional sources to article about film/television roles, including recent work on Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.-- HistoricalAccountings (talk) 12:08, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment If anyone here is looking for more sources, note that he is credited professionally under at least four name variations (maybe more) over a forty-year career: "Erik Rondell", "Eric Rondell", "Erick Rondell", "Erik L. Rondell". -- HistoricalAccountings (talk) 12:14, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: very suspicious nomination. versacespacetalk to me 02:46, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep By checking out the context of article and sources, notability will be established clearly.Fatzaof (talk) 20:50, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Though a C- or D-list actor, the subject of the article is clearly an A-list stuntman. KidAd • SPEAK 06:30, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Erik_Rondell&oldid=1009903157"