Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evgeny Ksenevich

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 18:09, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Evgeny Ksenevich

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not sure what's notable about this person or what's reliable about the sources. If this person is notable, then it would still be easier to delete this version and start from scratch. Deprodded per "SOFIXIT". Perhaps the deprodder would like to fix it during the course of this AfD? —S Marshall T/C 17:07, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —S Marshall T/C 17:07, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belarus-related deletion discussions. CptViraj (📧) 17:12, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:04, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:04, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This is the most unencyclopedic article I've ever seen on WP. A great example of WP:NOTBLOG. If they do turn out to be indeed notable, I think this is a case of WP:TNT for sure. Netherzone (talk) 18:48, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Purely promotional. All that's missing is paid admission to view the article. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 20:16, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
(Speedy?) delete per all. Wouldn't WP:G11 apply here? Mdaniels5757 (talk) 22:16, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Probably, and it also fits the criteria for CSD#X2, but it was deprodded, so someone thinks it's worth keeping. In the circumstances I felt AfD was the safest course.—S Marshall T/C 00:22, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this article is an x-pile, where x rhymes with fit, bit and wit. Unrecoverable promotional garbage. Impossible to assess notability.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 05:17, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It has been deleted twice on ru wiki; also per PROMO, GNG, and TNT. Theredproject (talk) 14:34, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nothing comes even close to showing notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:23, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteNotButtigieg (talk) 14:07, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.