Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harvest Bible Chapel Windsor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 00:57, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Harvest Bible Chapel Windsor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable church. No GNews hits for either "Harvest Bible Chapel Windsor" or "Southwood Community Church". St Anselm (talk) 20:24, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. St Anselm (talk) 20:25, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG, WP:ORG and reads like an advertisement. --Joshualouie711^talk 01:36, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 22:29, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 22:30, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - no conceivable legitimate claim to notability. Bearian (talk) 02:27, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Individual local churches do not get an automatic presumption of notability on Wikipedia just for existing, but there's no evidence of this one being the subject of enough reliable source coverage to clear WP:GNG — the only citation here, until I poleaxed it just now, was an invalid WP:CIRCULAR "reference" to another Wikipedia article. And yeah, this reads like an advertisement to boot — "unapologetic preaching, unashamed adoration, unceasing prayer, and unafraid witness"? Holy WP:NPOV violation, Jehosaphat. Bearcat (talk) 00:26, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- A typical NN church as far as I can see. I doubt this qualifies for speedy. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:11, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:30, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as per above.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 18:10, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.