Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herbert H. Kiehn Jr.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 02:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Herbert H. Kiehn Jr.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Here we have a small town mayor, that fails WP:POLITICIAN. Not only that, but its sourcing is so poor that it can't possibly meet WP:BLP Here's what we have for sources: 1. his mother's obituary 2. A link to a site that has election results, not for him, but for his father (not that it even matters because that site is not a reliable source) 3. A link to notes from a town council meeting- that link is no longer active, so I'm not sure exactly what was there, but regardless its a primary source.

WP:PROD was "denied" by USER:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) for unknown reasons. Rusf10 (talk) 03:09, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 03:27, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 03:27, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 03:27, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! ^{Babymissfortune} 03:28, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. No verifiability, not even WP:Notability. --Treetear (talk) 03:52, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not meant to be a comprehensive database of every mayor of every incorporated place in New Jersey. That is about the only level that could justify having an article on this individual.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:13, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As the article stands the notability standard is not met and Google isn't helping so far, especially in the shadow of his genuinely notable father. I am open to seeing sources added -- and will attempt to do so myself -- and changing my mind regarding notability but the 1970s can pose a challenge to find contemporaneous sources. Alansohn (talk) 17:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am not seeing reference material for this person, and everything we need to know can be found in his Wikidata entry. --RAN (talk) 18:57, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails GNG Chetsford (talk) 05:35, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.