Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iana Varnacova

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss World 2008. As a WP:ATD that was proposed. Two Weak Keep (with an emphasis of Weak) voters are using a mix of WP:JUSTAPOLICY and WP:ITSNOTABLE (just citing a policy without any reasoning as to why, and notable just because), which is to avoid in AfD. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 14:50, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Iana Varnacova

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanacova lacks significant sourcing. The one source in the article is not even a working link. My search for sources brought up nothing reliable. Just a directory listing for danesport competition, which I assume is the same person, but there is not enough information there to even be sure. John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:31, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: as non-notable beauty pageant winner. Rms125a@hotmail.com 05:37, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:41, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:41, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Moldova-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:41, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Miss World 2008 as per WP:ATD-R; a functional search term for readers. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:42, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I found an Internet Archive archive of the non-working link and added some other references. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:56, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Eastmain -- With all due respect, but this really does not endow her with any particular notability as far as I can tell after translating it. Rms125a@hotmail.com 00:54, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 00:32, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - Article needs improved, but I think subject passes WP:NMODEL. Would like to see sources added. Skirts⁸⁹ 15:09, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NMODEL cannot see her passing any point and lack independent third party sources and also fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 05:16, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep subject appears notable. Have we tried looking for non-English sources? -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 06:18, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ––Redditaddict69 ^(talk) ^(contribs) 06:14, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No idea about how WP:NMODEL works since it's so broad and none of the categories seem to apply, but none of the coverage is WP:SIGCOV and I don't see any sources which show she passes WP:GNG. SportingFlyer T·C 06:32, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Miss World 2008 where she is listed.--Richie Campbell (talk) 04:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.