Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. T. Lindroos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:06, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

J. T. Lindroos

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

J. T. Lindroos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:BLPPROD requirement of articles containing "no sources in any form". However, it does not meet the requirement of "All BLPs must have at least one source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article". Snowycats (talk) 17:12, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Snowycats (talk) 17:12, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Snowycats (talk) 17:12, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Snowycats (talk) 17:12, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:54, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:56, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

• Delete Non-notable WP:PROMO article created by an SPA. Best, GPL93 (talk) 01:12, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
• Delete. I can see things here that might be valid notability claims if the article were properly referenced to reliable sources, but nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to guarantee him the right to keep an unsourced article. Bearcat (talk) 15:55, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.