Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Muller

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. SK#1: Nom was withdrawn. czar 14:29, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Muller

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A police detective. Referenced, sort of, no wiki links, I have trouble finding all of those refs but this is "probably" not a hoax, through verifying most of the content is a pain. Still, bottom line is that this bio seems to fail WP:NBIO. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:21, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:50, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:57, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:42, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The subject of this article appears to have been the subject of a book, and a number of articles in reliable sources. Having "trouble" finding the references does not mean that these references do not exist. as such this is an easy pass for WP:BASIC. Finally, AFD is not cleanup, so the lack of in-line citations does not mean we should delete. FOARP (talk) 12:51, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw. The article is such a mess that I missed this book, which seems to have a very low visibility online but it does exist and is not SPS ([1]) so I guess it is sufficient to make the subject notable. Through while AfD is not cleanup this mess of an article may warrant WP:TNT. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:45, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep I guess this is a notable subject, although I am a bit surprised.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:59, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.