Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jimmy Wales (4th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep because I said so! Non-admin closure and a Happy April Fool's Day! :) Warrah (talk) 17:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmy Wales

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is clearly a vanity page about some non-notable guy and his idea for some internet thingamajig. Surely this isn't notable. — BQZip01 — ^talk 04:15, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

*KEEP - Need I say more? This user is making a WP:POINT that is pointless. --Morenooso (talk) 04:18, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Did I say keep? I meant creep. --Morenooso (talk) 07:07, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Gets no ghits, is a loser and his article (if you could call that an article) is WP:MADEUP. --Morenooso (talk) 07:07, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
How so?!? I think my point has significant merit! I strongly urge you to change your mind! — BQZip01 — ^talk 04:20, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NOTE Reopened per [1] — BQZip01 — ^talk 05:04, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Earth ! Kenrick Talk 05:33, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Userfy to User:Jimbo Wales. Then, the subject could continue writing about himself on that page. Alexius08 (talk) 06:05, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Rename to Wikipedia:Jimmy "Jimbo" Wales, since this is selfreferential to Wikipedia, and WP:BLP1E , also WP:COI , and Wikipedia is not a reliable source. 76.66.192.73 (talk) 06:48, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Question Can someone remind me what Jimbo Wales actual date of birth is? Again? JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 07:09, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Answer - His birth certificate reads the 7th but his driver license reads the 8th. As per the note on his made-up page, he prefers the 8th. --Morenooso (talk) 07:14, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I tagged his article with [[WP:MADEUP]]. Somebody made that thing up in one day. It ought to be courtesy blanked. Beep, beep - my a$$. --Morenooso (talk) 07:19, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Send to the Om Nom Nom Machine Kwsn (Ni!) 07:20, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Someone ought to nominate User:Jimbo Wales/Statement of principles. Talk about WP:OTHERCRAP. It's WP:DUCKSEASON. --Morenooso (talk) 07:44, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - as per MY nom. Yeah, that's the ticket. I came up with this nom. Being Wikipedia:BOLD, I get to vote twice. Let it snow. --Morenooso (talk) 10:59, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to WP:BEARDKEEP and delete WP:BEARDMUSTGO Ks0stm ^(T•C•G) 13:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy beard per WP:BEARD. Reach Out to the Truth 13:49, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Highly notable individual. Grandmartin11 (talk) 16:25, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Is there any evidence this guy actually exists outside of this site? Grandmartin11 (talk) 16:25, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
'Redirect to Rachel Marsden 75.70.221.14 (talk) 21:02, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
After Party !vote: Rename to User:Jimbo Wales. I agree with Alexius08. That way, the subject can promote himself. -FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 21:48, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.