Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Earle Sullivan (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SNOW, this isn’t going anywhere. The previous AfD closed less than 2 days ago. (non-admin closure) SK2242 (talk) 05:40, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

John Earle Sullivan

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/John Earle Sullivan
• Articles for deletion/John Earle Sullivan (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

John Earle Sullivan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not even close to notable, text book example of an an WP:UNDUE WP:BLP1E Sure there's some limited news coverage of a WP:SINGLEEVENT, and also WP:NOTNEWS. What has this guy actually done? Not much of any note, this seems fairly obvious. Bacondrum 04:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

• Procedural speedy keep: We literally just had this. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 04:44, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
• Keep. It was "No consensus, Trending towards keep", in the previous AFD closed just a day before this nomination, no new information which would point to a different result, and we will just rehash the same argument which gets close to WP:POINT. I would encourage the nominator to withdraw the nomination so Wikipedia:Speedy keep could apply. --Salix alba (talk): 06:31, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:08, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:08, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

• Keep. Nothing has changed in the 18 hours since the previous AFD closed. tedder (talk) 15:42, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.