Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josey Greenwell (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. An article on the subject was deleted in 2013 and there is a consensus that this new version does not meet the requirements either. Haukur (talk) 09:38, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Josey Greenwell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography of a non notable musician who fails to meet WP:GNG, WP:MUSICBIO and already deleted via an AfC discussion. Almost all of the sources cited are unreliable, self published, and has no significant coverage in multiple secondary, reliable sources. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 07:15, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 07:15, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Half of the sources are blatant PR services. As for the other, admittedly I'm not well-versed in LBGQT sources but what's here seems pretty insignificant, being Q & A or promotional. The only thing that come close to indicating some kind of notability is the Esquire piece, and although one could make the argument it is about him because he is called out by name through out, the purpose of the piece--what it's really about--is a shopping experience; he's just the model they happen to use. A definite fail per WP:MUSIC and WP:GNG. ShelbyMarion (talk) 14:41, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, PR --Devokewater @ 15:34, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Has a few softball interviews in LGBT publications and was mentioned in passing in a few stories about events in which he was involved (as noted by Shelby above), but the found sources tend to be reprints of press releases and the usual self-created social media promotions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 02:26, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete interviews do not add up to notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:21, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.